Author: National Library of Medicine (U.S.)Publish On: 1979
... N16180000 NEW YORK TIMES ( FILM COPY ) W1 NE919 N16220000 NEW YORK TIMES CUMULATIVE SUBJECT AND PERSONAL NAME INDEXES ON ORDER N16240000 NEW YORK TIMES INDEX ZAI 21 N44 N16260000 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY ( 0028-7865 ) ...
Author: National Library of Medicine (U.S.)
A keyword listing of serial titles currently received by the National Library of Medicine.
Cheney averaged a little more than three entries a month in the New York Times index in his fourteen - month tenure as chief of staff , a figure that is on the low end for contemporary chiefs of staff . During the last twenty years only ...
Author: Richard J. Ellis
Publisher: Studies in Government & Public
Choice Outstanding Title H. R. Haldeman, President Nixon's former chief of staff, is said to have boasted: "Every president needs a son of a bitch, and I'm Nixon's. I'm his buffer and I'm his bastard. I get done what he wants done and I take the heat instead of him." Richard Ellis explores the widely discussed but poorly understood phenomenon of presidential "lightning rods"--cabinet officials who "take the heat" instead of their bosses. Whether by intent or circumstance, these officials divert criticism and blame away from their presidents. The phenomenon is so common that it's assumed to be an essential item in every president's managerial toolbox. But, Ellis argues, such assumptions can oversimplify our understanding of this tool. Ellis advises against indiscriminate use of the lightning rod metaphor. Such labeling can hide as much as it reveals about presidential administration and policymaking at the cabinet level. The metaphor often misleads by suggesting strategic intent on the president's part while obscuring the calculations and objectives of presidential adversaries and the lightning rods themselves. Ellis also illuminates the opportunities and difficulties that various presidential posts--especially secretaries of state, chiefs of staff, and vice presidents--have offered for deflecting blame from our presidents. His study offers numerous detailed and instructive examples from the administrations of Truman (Dean Acheson); Eisenhower (Richard Nixon, John Foster Dulles, Herbert Brownell, and Ezra Taft Benson); LBJ (Hubert Humphrey); Ford (Henry Kissinger); and Reagan (James Watt). These examples, Ellis suggests, should guide our understanding of the relationship between lightning rods and presidential leadership, policymaking, and ratings. Blame avoidance, he warns, does have its limitations and may even backfire at times. Nevertheless, President Clinton and his successors may need to rely on such tools. The presidency, Ellis points out, finds itself the object of increasingly intense partisan debate and microscopic scrutiny by a wary press. Lightning rods can deflect such heat and help the president test policies, gauge public opinion, and protect his political power and public image. Ellis's book is an essential primer for helping us understand this process.
See references to Satanism and ritual abuse in The New York Times Index 7997—2001 (New York: New York Times Company, 1998—2002) and in The Times Index 1997—2002 (Reading, UK: Gale, 1998—2002). 24. See Neil blacFarquhar, “Man Is Indicted ...
Author: John A Saliba
Publisher: AltaMira Press
Discussions of any religion can easily raise passions. But arguments tend to become even more heated when the religion under discussion is characterized as new. Divisions around the study of new religious movements (NRMs), or cults, or nontraditional or alternative or emergent religions are so acute that there is even controversy over what to call them. John Saliba strives to bring balance to these discussions by offering perspectives on new religions from different academic perspectives: history, psychology, sociology, law, theology, and counseling. This approach provides rich descriptions of a broad range of movements while demonstrating how the differing aims of the disciplines can create much of the controversy around NRMs. The new second edition has been updated and revised throughout and includes a new foreword by noted historian of religion, J. Gordon Melton. For classes in religion or the social sciences, or for interested individuals, Understanding New Religious Movements offers the most objective introduction possible.