Rust in support of the appeal . ] The point upon which your Lordships wish to hear me is , whether the petition filed is in order ; and whether an appeal lies from two Judges sitting in the Supreme Court to the full Court sitting in ...
Author: United States. Claims board. (War Dept.)Publish On: 1921
On appeal to the Secretary of War , decision affirmed . ( See these decisions , Vol . V , p . 1019. ) ( Globe Automatic Sprinkler Co. , Case No. 2453 , VIII these Dec. , 16. ) The Appeal Section , War Department Claims Board ...
In 1681 , it is said there was an Appeal in favor of the Founder's kindred , and that Appeal succeeded ; but the success of that Appeal , was immediately followed by an Appeal of another kind , on the part of the College , an Appeal not ...
Author: United States. War Department. Claims BoardPublish On: 1920
nection with appeals to the Bureau Claims Boards and to the Board of Contract Adjustment . 1. Controversies arising as to the terms of settlement of contracts or agreements suspended prior to complete performance ( including both ...
Author: United States. War Department. Claims Board
Author: New Brunswick. Supreme CourtPublish On: 1848
The appeal being evidently the hearing , and the Governor to issue a writ for that purpose , in whai manner is he commanded to do it ? In the manner usualiy accustomed in England , where such writs were then in use , with the authority ...
In the other provinces ad hoc judges sit occasionally on the appeal court on an as - needed basis , but not nearly as frequently as in Alberta . Virtually all of the appeals are heard by three - judge panels , but occasionally a case is ...
Author: Ian Greene
Publisher: James Lorimer & Company
ISBN: 1550285645
Category: Law
Page: 250
View: 245
The authors explain the role of appeal courts, consider how appeal court judges make their decisions, and look at the types of cases that go to appeal. Contents: 1 Canada's Top 100 Judges: The Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, and the Provincial Courts of Appeal 2 The Appellate Process 3 The Panel Process 4 The Decision 5 Defending the Decision 6 The Impact of Appellate Decision-Making 7 The Supreme Court of Canada 8 Conclusion and Agenda for Reform
Author: United States. Unemployment Insurance ServicePublish On: 1970
Nonappearance of Parties Appeals should not be dismissed automatically because one or both of the parties fail to appear at the hearing . The appeal tribunal should award or deny benefits only if the ascertainable facts justify it .
Author: United States. Unemployment Insurance Service
The minute appointing the meeting being read , the clerk asked , If the committee of appeals was prepared to lay their report before the meeting ? Which was presented accordingly . When J. G. Bevan addressed the meeting , respecting the ...
Appeal Rates, Reversal Rates, and Circuit Size A variation on the unstable law argument asserts that increasing the number of judges on a circuit court would create instability in the law of the circuit and that this instability in turn ...
Author: William M. Richman
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 9780199367054
Category: Law
Page: 256
View: 371
The United States Circuit Courts of Appeals are among the most important governmental institutions in our society. However, because the Supreme Court can hear less than 150 cases per year, the Circuit Courts (with a combined caseload of over 60,000) are, for practical purposes, the courts of last resort for all but a tiny fraction of federal court litigation. Thus, their significance, both for ultimate dispute resolution and for the formation and application of federal law, cannot be overstated. Yet, in the last forty years, a dramatic increase in caseload and a systemic resistance to an increased judgeship have led to a crisis. Signed published opinions form only a small percentage of dispositions; judges confer on fifty routine cases in an afternoon; and most litigants are denied oral argument completely. In Injustice on Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis, William M. Richman and William L. Reynolds chronicle the transformation of the United States Circuit Courts; consider the merits and dangers of continued truncating procedures; catalogue and respond to the array of specious arguments against increasing the size of the judiciary; and consider several ways of reorganizing the circuit courts so that they can dispense traditional high quality appellate justice even as their caseloads and the number of appellate judgeships increase. The work serves as an analytical capstone to the authors' thirty years of research on the issue and will constitute a powerful piece of advocacy for a more responsible and egalitarian approach to caseload glut facing the circuit courts.
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of LordsPublish On: 1843
I am speaking of the appeal of the defender , who questions the title of the pursuer to obtain relief against the defender . Mr Connell . – Mr Horne has brought a cross appeal here . Lord Brougham . — There was no cross appeal ...