Maybe that's because LA. is the desert, and every LA. story just a desert story in
disguise. ... According to legend, a nurse named Eva once perished in these hills,
losing her way as she trekked from Tijuana to the home of a patient. ... We cross
through the dark basilica to the stables where Madeleine, as played by Judy as
played by Kim Novak, recalls her life as ... In our company are two pensioner
brothers from Yorkshire named Martin and Jared, one of whom has two artificial
Los Angeles magazine is a regional magazine of national stature. Our combination of award-winning feature writing, investigative reporting, service journalism, and design covers the people, lifestyle, culture, entertainment, fashion, art and architecture, and news that define Southern California. Started in the spring of 1961, Los Angeles magazine has been addressing the needs and interests of our region for 48 years. The magazine continues to be the definitive resource for an affluent population that is intensely interested in a lifestyle that is uniquely Southern Californian.
Kim Philby, Donald Maclean, and Guy Burgess S. J. Hamrick ... A legend in his
time.—A cold reception in Moscow.—Isolation and mistrust.—Moscow
merchandizes its hero.—A broken-down pensioner. ... The myth of London's
Author: S. J. Hamrick
Publisher: Yale University Press
Among the more sensational espionage cases of the Cold War were those of Moscow’s three British spies—Kim Philby, Donald Maclean, and Guy Burgess. In this riveting book, S. J. Hamrick draws on documentary evidence concealed for almost half a century in reconstructing the complex series of 1947–1951 events that led British intelligence to identify all three as Soviet agents. Basing his argument primarily on the Venona archive of broken Soviet codes released in 1995–1996 as well as on complementary Moscow and London sources, Hamrick refutes the myth of MI5’s identification of Maclean as a Soviet agent in the spring of 1951. British intelligence knew far earlier that Maclean was Moscow’s agent and concealed that knowledge in a 1949–1951 counterespionage operation that deceived Philby and Burgess. Hamrick also introduces compelling evidence of a 1949–1950 British disinformation initiative using Philby to mislead Moscow on Anglo-American retaliatory military capability in the event of Soviet aggression in Western Europe. Engagingly written and impressively documented, Deceiving the Deceivers breaks new ground in reinterpreting the final espionage years of three infamous spies and in clarifying fifty years of conjecture, confusion, and error in Anglo-American intelligence history.